Book · British Raj · Fiction · Historical Fiction · History · India · Literature · Nazi · Novels · Reading · World War II

The French Girl & The German Boy

After much deliberation and delay, I finally delved into All The Light We Cannot See by Anthony Doerr. Yes, I am aware I am really late for the party, but atleast I got here. This is especially significant, considering, I usually give prize winning novels a wide berth. Anyhow, I spent the two weekend nights all being super comfortable in my bed, drinking cups of Rose tea and reading this 2014 Pulitzer prize winning work!

The book is set during the World War II, briefly covering the year of 1934, before delving into the events that occurs 1940-1945. The novel tells the story of Marie-Laurie, a young blind girl, the daughter to the locksmith to the Natural History Museum in Paris. Marie-Laurie spends time in her father’s museum, talking to the curator and reading Twenty Thousand Leagues Under the Sea, knowing of her father’s love and care for her. Her orderly life is shattered and brought  to a standstill, when Hitler’s Germany invades France and she and her father are forced to flee Paris, in wake of the occupation. In search of refuge of some kind, her father finally reached Saint Malo, the home of her great uncle. Her great Uncle, an erudite brilliant man, has shut himself up from the world, being afraid of shadows, since his experience in World War I. The father and daughter are however kindly looked after by the house keeper and days begin to melt into month, as Marie-Laurie tries to adjust herself to her new surroundings. Across the border, in a orphanage, Werner and Jutta, the orphaned children of a mine worker, listen to distant voices in a hand made radio, made by Werner,that tells them of miracles of science and wonders of the world. Wener’s brilliance with radio sciences and engineering is soon discovered by those in power and he is sent to an elite school to get trained to mold the future of Aryan Germany. It is at this school, that in the angst to ensure, he does not end up with a life like his father, he makes choices, that he knows Jutta will never forgive and which in his heart he knows is never acceptable. However, these choices seem to drag him down until he ends up in Saint Malo, with one chance to redeem all his past.

Now come the part about how I liked the book…well, I liked it a lot!! I thought the descriptions whether of the sea or of being stuck inside the rubble was mesmeric. The prose of the novel, lifted me and seared my soul and painted some breathe taking pictures. I loved how each character was drawn out, not by the descriptions that the author wrote but by their actions and how each of the character was etched out and stood out clearly and independently of others. I loved how Marie-Laurie’s life was made independent of her visual inabilities and made her do brave things, without any dependency on any other character.  I loved the subtleties in the characters like Etienne LeBlanc and Frank Volkheimer. It was wonderful getting to know them and see their lives unravel. The plot deviates from the usual boy meets girl phenomena and delves into relationships that are just as rich and yet cannot be defined by the standards set by the society. However despite all the brilliance of the book, I cannot help but feel that in the end, Werner’s fate was a bit of cliche; like he had to made to pay for all the betrayals in a de-la grande style. I could not help but feel that Mr. Doerr, kind of treads on the line of Flaubert and Tolstoy in making the fatal flaw, the unforgivable flaw. I somehow cannot help but feel that Werner’s fate had it been a bit different, would have been less maudlin and made more sense. Finally, speaking of fatal flaws, I have a one – that is never of quite liking a historical fiction, if it is inaccurate in its facts. Mr. Doerr unfortunately ends up making a minor error, but to me, it glares like a red hot iron, taking away much of the credibility of the book. In page 135, Kindle Print, Etienne talks about listening to broadcasts from Pakistan. The chapter is set in 1940, full 7 years before Pakistan came into being!!! How can the author not check his facts? How can his editor ignore such a blatant mistake? Or is it to the North, events of the South do not matter? Mr. Doerr should know that while many French, American and German soldiers died, there were more than 2 million Indian troops who also fought defending a nation, that was not theirs, fighting for a cause they had no say in, all because as a country they belonged to the Great British Empire. Their identity and their heritage is disparaged by such errors, and their efforts negated, by the complete ignominy that is assigned to them by the careless stroke of the pen!

Advertisements

14 thoughts on “The French Girl & The German Boy

  1. Wow, that error doesn’t appear very minor to me. Yikes!

    I’ve eyed this book for awhile, but in spite of your wonderful review, I think I will stay eyeing it. I do have plans to try to read some more current fiction (I just ordered Half of a Yellow Sun from the library but who knows if I’ll get to it) but if I’m really honest, I have no desire to. Too many classics and then authors like Margery Sharpe and Elizabeth Goudge, not to mention Gormenghast and epics like the House of Niccolò series. Sigh! Okay, I must rush off to read!!!!

    1. Yes…keep eyeing it!! Its a good book but I think,there are some much better authors there writing on similar subjects. Margery Sharp YOU NEED TO READ!! I have heard a lot of good stuff about Half a Yellow Sun. Let me know how that goes!

    1. I know and that’s what bothered me I guess…India was partitioned off to make Pakistan and the citizens of both the nations, then unified under the common country of India fought bravely for a cause they had no say in. And then someone respected makes a mistake like this and well…it shows the kind of apathy and neglect of what the South did for a free and better world. I cannot look past it.

      1. Yes, that was a major mistake that some editor should have pounced on and I’m afraid to say that a boob on that scale would have ruined my pleasure in the book. The Asian half of WW2 is still, I think, understood less than it should be.

      2. Complete agree. I mean the are not Editors especially of historical fiction supposed to check such facts? Like I said , that error was a representation of much more than the typo. Its a tragedy that the Asian contribution counts for so little in the world history of the WWs.

  2. Oh dear, what a large and unfortunate error. I haven’t read the book and don’t intend to, but what a drag it spoiled a story you had really enjoyed up until that point.

    1. It has some lovely prose Stefanie and the characters are really well etched out. But I cannot help but feel that this error kind of marred my entire reading experience!!

      1. Good catch cirtnecce, but I guess that sort of error wouldn’t put me off because it’s not critical to the story. I guess readers could argue (and fair enough too) that that error could suggest other errors that they mightn’t have picked, but for me it always comes down to the fact that it’s fiction and I’m interested in whether the characters, their emotions, their development make sense and are interesting. For me, the history is just the background to provide the setting, the crisis or drama perhaps that the characters face which in this case is the rise of Nazism and the German occupation of France.

        That reference to Pakistan, if I remember correctly, was in reference to the spread of radio broadcasts at the time – so the point was not to do with Pakistan but that radio broadcasts were spreading far and wide? Or have I forgotten?

        Still, it would have been good if editors had got that right.

      2. I know exactly what you mean and I completely agree that it does not take anything away from the story per se. More importantly, the point that the sentence was driving like you correctly mention is the spread of the radio based communication. I guess you could say my personal involvement is coloring my view – its just that it showed a complete lack of respect towards our geography which is not part of the first world gamut and completely negated our presence and identity. India was not partitioned well after 4 years from this incident, which led to the creation of Pakistan. More importantly the united India had millions of soldiers fighting this war and somehow that oversight that too in a book considered to be a literary masterpiece is bit hard to digest. My grandfather was an army doctor in the war and never returned and my family has lost a lot when the partitioned happened. I guess you could say I am not impartial. But again I do agree with you that stand alone it does not take anything away from the story at all and there is much to like in the book!

    1. The language is truly lyrical. I loved the prose…there was a mesmeric quality in the words. Unfortunately , that oversight is something I cannot look past and stops the book from being perfection!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s